Review by
Eric Hillis
Directed by: Ridley Scott
Starring: Paul Mescal, Denzel Washington, Pedro Pascal, Joseph Quinn, Fred Hechinger, Lior Raz, Derek Jacobi,
Connie Nielsen
They say Rome wasn't built in a day, but it might have been if
Ridley Scott was in charge of that project. The octogenarian shows no
signs of halting his career and continues to knock out the sort of epic
movies most filmmakers spend multiple years slaving over. It's remarkable
that a film as big as Gladiator II is arriving a mere year
after Scott's similarly large scale
Napoleon. That said, this sequel feels like a product that has been rushed to
market rather than one that has had a full 24 years to nail down its
story.
A key image in 2000's Gladiator was that of Russell Crowe's
Maximus brushing his hand across rows of corn stalks, a symbol of his dream
of one day being granted his freedom from his position as general in the
Roman army and returning to his modest farm and family.
Gladiator II opens with a close-up of its hero's hand filled
with grain, letting us know that this movie will follow a protagonist who is
living the life Maximus could ultimately only dream of.
Said protagonist is Lucius (Paul Mescal), son of Lucilla (Connie Nielsen, making us all feel self-conscious by still being able to pull off the
same figure-hugging ensemble she sported 24 years ago). As flashbacks
reveal, Lucilla sent her son away from Rome following the events of the
first film. Two decades later we find him living in a community of warriors
on the North African coast, which comes under attack by Roman forces lead by
General Marcus Acacius (Pedro Pascal). Just as Maximus lost his
wife and son, Lucius suffers a similar loss when his wife dies in battle.
And just as Maximus ended up being purchased by a former slave turned
gladiator stable owner, so too does Lucius, who finds himself in the stable
of Macrinus (Denzel Washington). Lucius's formidable skill in the arena leads to him being brought to Rome,
where again like Maximus, he becomes a star of the Coliseum as he gets
embroiled in a political power struggle.
As we've become accustomed to with modern "legacy sequels,"
Gladiator II is practically a rehash of its predecessor's
plot. Unfortunately this results in it being defined not by its additions,
as it fails to add much of note, but rather by its notable absences. Though
a buffed-up Mescal certainly looks the part, he's a poor substitute for
Crowe, who sold Maximus's strength with the power of his gaze as much as his
physique (on a rewatch of Gladiator I was struck by how well
Scott used the eyes of his performers, an element absent here). Joaquin
Phoenix's scenery chewing villain Commodus is sorely missed, replaced her by
two antagonists in brothers Geta (Joseph Quinn) and Caracalla (Fred Hechinger), two real life emperors portrayed here
like a Roman Jedward, complete with matching hairstyles. The slave played
by Djimon Hounsou in the original, who acted as a moral centre for Crowe's
Maximus, is reworked here into a freed gladiator turned doctor (Alexander Karim) whose job is to refresh the memories of both Lucius and the audience
regarding how Gladiator II's protagonist is connected to the first film. Harry Gregson-Williams' score has none of the weight of Hans
Zimmer's booming Holst tribute.
Perhaps the biggest loss is that of the first film's roster of classic
British and Irish thespians, with Oliver Reed, Richard Harris and David
Hemmings sadly no longer with us, though Derek Jacobi does briefly
reprise his role of Senator Gracchus. The job of providing acting gravitas falls solely on
the shoulders of Scott brothers' fave Washington. The actor stands out
here with a level of charisma his co-stars can't compete with, but also
because his character feels like a modern time-traveller who has returned to
Ancient Rome with the knowledge of how this all plays out. Where the first
film harked back to the historical epics of mid-20th-century Hollywood,
Gladiator II betrays the influence of
Game of Thrones, particularly in Macrinus's Iago-esque arc. This results in a film that
rushes through the sort of plot that would play out over multiple seasons
of a TV show, and its various character arcs come off as insubstantial and
unconvincing in the process.
For all its political machinations and power-plays, the first film had a
very simple story, that of a man out to avenge the murders of his wife and
child. We knew from the first act who the hero was and what he was aiming
to achieve. It's not until the final act that
Gladiator II decides what Lucius's exact role is in the
drama. Despite the death of his wife, he doesn't appear to be spurred by
revenge (Mescal's cheeky chappy routine seems odd for a man who just lost
his wife), and the man responsible, Pascal's Acacius, is barely present in
the story. The movie sets up Geta and Caracalla as a pair of wrong 'uns
who deserve their comeuppance, but it never explicitly pits them against
Lucius in the way Maximus and Commodus were set for a showdown.
What's most disappointing about Gladiator II is the comparative lack of
spectacle. While everything about this sequel is bigger in theory, on the
screen it lacks the wow factor of the original's bloody gladiatorial
sequences. Taking its cues more from Italian peplum knockoffs than classic
Hollywood epics, Gladiator II has its hero essentially
battle monsters rather than men, with Lucius fighting shaved baboons, a
giant rhino, and in the film's silliest sequence, sharks (!!!). This jars
with how seriously the film takes its political subplots, and such
sequences aren't thrilling enough to provide more than a minor distraction
from the dull sub-Shakespeare subplots that take up most of the running
time. In Scott's hands (if he hasn't handed such duties over to a second
unit, as I suspect may be the case) the action is messy and difficult to
follow, and you'll find yourself envious of the Coliseum spectators who
get to see the action unfold from a better vantage point than your cinema
seat. The film's best action sequence - the opening naval assault on
Lucius's community - is a poor cousin of a similar set-piece from
Waterworld, making us yearn for the days when proper action filmmakers like Kevin
Reynolds were entrusted with projects of this scale.
Though almost a half hour shorter, Gladiator II feels like
a much longer film than its predecessor, mostly because there's so little
for the viewer to invest in. It lacks awe-inspiring visuals, a commanding
central performance, entertaining villains and a narrative we can get
behind from the start. Like the real life Coliseum, it's impressive that
it got made, but Gladiator II leaves us dreaming about the
past.
Gladiator II is in UK/ROI
cinemas from November 14th.
