 
  Review by
        Eric Hillis
  Directed by: Sarah Gyllenstierna
  Starring: Ardalan Esmaili, Magnus Krepper, Jens Hultén
 
    
    The last couple of years have seen several indie filmmakers set their
      narratives against the backdrop of hunting trips. In The Integrity of Joseph Chambers, an emasculated man heads into the woods determined to kill an animal to
      prove his manhood, with disastrous consequences. Hunting Daze sees a stripper stuck with the male hunting party she performed
      for, and embraces her masculine side in the process. A teenage lesbian
      endures an increasingly uncomfortable hunting trip in the company of her
      father and his estranged friend in Good One. In A Family Guide to Hunting a woman uses a hunting trip as a means of introducing her
      Korean-American family to her white boyfriend.
  
    What could be behind this current trend? I suspect first and foremost
      it's a case of following the advice of confining your low budget movie to
      a single location, and a forest gives you instant production value. But
      it's also a chance to explore several themes within that setting, with
      disparate characters thrown together in a milieu that some will embrace
      while others will be uncomfortable within.

    With Hunters on a White Field, Swedish writer/director Sarah Gyllenstierna puts three men in a forest, loads them
        up with alcohol and ammo, and watches the sparks fly. It has a similar
        dynamic to Hunting Daze, but here it's not a woman positioned as the outsider but a young
        Asian man, Alex (Ardalan Esmaili). Alex embarks on a hunting trip
        with his older boss Gregger (Magnus Krepper), whom he is keen to
        impress. Gregger seems similarly impressed by Alex and has taken him
        under his fatherly wings. They head off to the Swedish countryside, with
        Gregger tearing up the back roads in his sportscar, and arrive at a
        cabin owned by the family of the boorish Henrik (Jens Hultén).
  
    At first Alex is clearly uncomfortable in the presence of these two
        loud and obnoxious white men, who physically tower over him and don't
        hesitate in making crude jokes about his dark skin negating his need for
        camouflage. Desperate to fit in, Alex keeps quiet. But when Alex starts
        bagging animals, something changes within him. He discovers something
        primal within himself and starts to stand up for himself in the company
        of Gregger and Henrik, who come to view him as an equal.

    For its first hour, Hunters on a White Field is an effective slow burn character study. With minimal
        dialogue, Gyllenstierna portrays the shifting psychologies of each of her male
        protagonists. As Alex becomes a gun-toting alpha male, Gregger and
        Henrik become less boorish and begin speaking in pseudo-spiritual terms
        about the communion between hunter and prey. There's a sad desperation
        in these men who have climbed ladders to lofty perches in society and
        yet feel like they've lost something along the way, that they've been
        tamed by modern society. There's much talk of the old Viking ways, and
        it's telling that Alex begins to metaphorically puff his chest out when
        he's accidentally cut by an ancient hunting knife during some boisterous
        play-acting. You get the sense that Alex is empowered by killing animals
        because for the first time in his life he feels like he's the one in
        control.
    Things take an unwieldy tonal shift in a final act that plunges the
        drama into the realm of the absurd. The three men make a pact and
        suddenly the film begins to resemble something like Marco
        Ferreri's La Grande Bouffe in its satirical detachment from reality. It's a shift I'm afraid
        I simply couldn't buy, as it jars so much with the psychological
        character study the film had rendered so effectively prior to that
        point.

    If her feature debut doesn't quite come together, there's much here to
        suggest Gyllenstierna is a filmmaker of some promise. In her film's moody
        build-up she creates a tense atmosphere by allowing us to observe how
        the characters react to one another's behaviour. She never relies on
        dialogue to define her characters; in fact what's said here is often a
        defensive front and nothing uttered by these insecure men can be taken
        at face value. But perhaps her film's greatest strength is in how deeply
        pathetic it makes the "sport" of killing animals appear. This is clearly
        a pastime for deeply insecure, middle class, middle-aged men. Just buy a
        sportscar lads.
  
   
       
