
  Review by
        Eric Hillis
  Directed by: M. Might Shyamalan
  Starring: Gael García Bernal, Vicky Krieps, Eliza Scanlen, Thomasin McKenzie, Alex
      Wolff, Abbey Lee, Aaron Pierre, Rufus Sewell, Ken Leung, Nikki Amuka-Bird,
      Embeth Davidtz
 
    
      When you review four or five new movies every week you inevitably come
      across a lot of turkeys. Occasionally you stumble across a free-range
      turkey, a movie that's objectively bad yet is clearly made by talented
      hands. M. Night Shyamalan is the modern master of the free-range
      turkey. Most of the movies he's made over the last 20 years have been
      pretty rough, yet there's always a diamond in the coalface that makes his
      work worth continuing to mine.
    
    
      Old is just such a movie. Overall it's a mess. As with so
      many of Shyamalan's films it boasts a killer premise but never manages to
      exploit its potential. The dialogue is clunky as hell. The plot leaves you
      scratching your head with its many holes and oversights. The camerawork
      and editing are at times baffling. Yet for all that, there are brief, all
      too brief, glimpses of filmmaking brilliance that make Shyamalan one of
      the more interesting filmmakers working in mainstream cinema today,
      despite all his flaws.
    
     
      
      The blame for this one can't entirely be levelled at Shyamalan as
      Old is adapted from a graphic novel by
      Pierre Oscar Levy and Frederick Peeters. You can see why the
      director was attracted to the project as its premise could easily have
      come from his own imagination. On a
      Fantasy Island
      style resort, a group of people are left on a secluded, seemingly idyllic
      beach, only to find themselves aging at a rate that equates to roughly one
      year for every 30 minutes. The only way out is through a cave that speeds
      up the aging process so much that you'd be dead before you made it
      through.
    
    
      It's a cracking premise, isn't it? But sometimes the most arresting ideas
      just don’t translate into a feature film.
    
    
      Old is about the role time plays in our lives. Near the end
      of the movie, one character, who is in their dotage by that point,
      expresses regret at wasting their time trying to find a way out of their
      predicament. The back half of their life passed them by in a matter of
      hours because they were too busy trying to escape from their life rather
      than sitting back and enjoying their time on the beach. Most of us live
      for roughly 80 decades, but how much of that time is spent actually
      living? Humans have developed a system that forces us to waste the bulk of
      our lives building security for a future we may not even make it to, and
      if we do, we'll probably be too knackered by that point to enjoy our
      freedom.
    
     
      
      It takes a long time for Shyamalan's film to make that point though, and
      you'll probably have lost patience with the movie before you can figure
      out what Shyamalan is trying to say in his own clunky way. You'll probably
      have grown frustrated with the film's half-assed approach to its central
      idea. You'll probably be distracted by questions like "If everyone is
      aging rapidly, why aren't their hair and nails growing?", "Why aren't
      their teeth rotting?" and "Why do the children seem to develop adult
      intellects as they rapidly age, without the years of experience and
      knowledge behind them?" Or you'll have grown irritated by the
      distractingly showy camerawork, all long pans that lead nowhere.
    
    
      Early in his career Shyamalan was labelled "The New Spielberg," an
      impossible burden for any filmmaker to carry. If anything, Shyamalan might
      be the new Rod Serling, but Serling told his stories in 30 minutes, not
      105. It's ironic that Old is about the time we waste,
      because it's really a Twilight Zone episode stretched out to
      feature length. If Shyamalan were born three decades earlier he'd probably
      be known for some of the best half hours of TV of the late 20th century,
      rather than for some of the worst feature films of the early 21st century.
    
     
      
      If Shyamalan is indeed Spielberg, then he's certainly not the Spielberg of
      the Raiders of the Lost Ark truck chase or the "We're gonna
      need a bigger boat" shock or Roy Neary discovering the real life mountain
      he's been making out of mashed potato. But he might be the Spielberg of
      Chief Brody's kid imitating his father's movements at the dinner table.
      Shyamalan is brilliant at developing characters through small visual
      gestures, something he sadly doesn't do enough of. There's an incredible
      moment in Old where Vicky Krieps asks her husband
      Gael Garcia Bernal to name the book she's currently reading. He
      hasn't a clue. She frowns and inserts her bookmark, towards the back of
      what might be described as a weighty tome. What an ingenious way to tell
      us everything we need to know about the relationship between this couple!
      How many of today's mainstream filmmakers could have come up with such a
      simple, economic piece of visual storytelling?
    
    
      Halfway through Old, I couldn't wait for the movie to be over, but I'd be lying if I said I
      wasn't excited for Shyamalan's next movie. If nothing else,
      Old serves as a curious sequel to
      The Father in which Rufus Sewell gets his comeuppance for mocking
      Anthony Hopkins' senility. You'll know what I mean when you see it.
    
     
    
      Old is on Netflix UK/ROI now.
    
    